IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2161046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overcoming dimensional dependence of worst case scenarios and maximum loss

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Breuer

Abstract

ABSTRACT Maximum Loss (MaxLoss) over admissibility domains with a specified probability shows a peculiar kind of dimensional dependence. For a fixed portfolio and fixed probability of the admissibility domain, the inclusion of additional risk factors increases MaxLoss – even if the additional risk factors are irrelevant for the portfolio or if they are highly correlated to other risk factors already included in the description. We propose a method to avoid this counter-intuitive effect: if we characterize the admissibility domain by its Mahalanobis radius instead of its probability, the inclusion of irrelevant risk factors does not affect MaxLoss. This result is also formulated for non-normal risk factor distributions. Furthermore, we present the problem of coordinate dependence of MaxLoss: MaxLoss over admissibility domains of point scenarios depends on the choice of coordinates. This problem is shown to be an artefact of considering point scenarios. Maximum expected loss over admissibility domains of generalized scenarios with I -divergence below some threshold is invariant under coordinate transformations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Breuer, . "Overcoming dimensional dependence of worst case scenarios and maximum loss," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk/2161046/overcoming-dimensional-dependence-of-worst-case-scenarios-and-maximum-loss
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.