IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2161007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved duration-based backtesting of value-at-risk

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Haas

Abstract

ABSTRACT Backtesting value-at-risk forecasts is an important issue. A duration-based approach has recently been proposed by Christoffersen and Pelletier (2004). Their method is very appealing because it allows one to test for both correct conditional and unconditional coverage against quite general alternatives, thus generalizing earlier approaches. Despite the discrete nature of the problem, the authors used the continuous Weibull distribution in their implementation of the method. In this paper, we employ the discrete counterpart of this model instead. We argue that the discrete approach has two advantages. First, the parameters involved have a clear-cut interpretation in risk management terms. Moreover, and more importantly, simulations indicate that the discrete model has superior power properties to the continuous candidate. As the discrete Weibull distribution is not well known in the risk management literature, its properties relevant to backtesting are also briefly discussed.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161007
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-10/jor_v8n2a2_backtest.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2161007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.