IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/2160967.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On testing the equality of multiple Sharpe ratios, with application on the evaluation of iShares

Author

Listed:
  • Pui-Lam Leung, Wing-Keung Wong

Abstract

ABSTRACT Extending the work of Jobson and Korkie (1981), Lo (2002) and Memmel (2003), this paper applies the technique of the repeated measures designed to develop a multivariate Sharpe ratio statistic to test the hypothesis of the equality of multiple Sharpe ratios. We also work out the asymptotic distribution of the statistic and its properties. To demonstrate the superiority of our proposed statistic over the traditional pairwise Sharpe ratio test, we illustrate our approach by testing the equality of the Sharpe ratios for 18 iShares. Whereas the pairwise Sharpe ratio test shows that the performance of all 18 iShares is indistinguishable, our test results reject the equality of the Sharpe ratios in each year as well as in the entire sample, implying that the 18 iShares perform differently in each year as well as in the entire sample, with some outperforming others in the market. The multivariate Sharpe ratio statistic developed in our paper provides investors with a tool to evaluate their portfolios’ performance and enables them to make wiser decisions in their investments.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2160967
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/10203/On_testing_the_equality_of_multiple_Sharpe_ratios.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:2160967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.