IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7961151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The robot-labeling phenomenon: robot-ready modern operational risk management

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Prisznyák

Abstract

Human-free (robo) bank branches operating autonomously with software and embodied robots are now a reality, posing significant operational risks. Robots utilizing diverse underlying technologies exhibit varying risk profiles based on their intelligence and level of autonomy. Risks stemming from robot-related incidents should be integrated into the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s existing framework. Therefore, understanding the definition of “robot†in the banking sector is crucial for effective operational risk management. This study fills a gap in the literature by discussing the robot-labeling phenomenon (ie, indiscriminate use of the term “robot†to mean both a physical and digital form) and highlighting its widespread misuse in the literature and in banking practice. Analysis of the Hungarian Operational Risk (HunOR) database reveals that the current operations do not record robot autonomy or human oversight, and human-centered risk categorization predominates in risk event categorization, which lacks specific categories for autonomous artificial intelligence or robots. This paper advocates for a shift in the operational risk management mindset to address synthetic era challenges through enhanced risk profiling, human–robot task trade-off catalogs, incident catalogs, operational risk database modernization, training and the establishment of cross-functional robotics forums.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Prisznyák, . "The robot-labeling phenomenon: robot-ready modern operational risk management," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7961151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7961151
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7961151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.