IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7960716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of the fraction of losses and their probabilities by type of risk and business line from aggregate loss data

Author

Listed:
  • Henryk Gzyl
  • Argimiro Arratia

Abstract

Basel III rules require financial institutions to report operational losses and detail them in a database. Operational losses should be classified by the Basel II-determined risk types and also by line of business. While the operational risk capital requirement is now calculated using the standardized measurement approach (SMA) based on gross income, the collected data is nevertheless still useful for risk management purposes. However, the frequency of losses and the incurred losses per line of business and risk type may only be available in aggregate form, and this data needs to be disaggregated for better risk management. We propose a disaggregation method to derive the individual loss severities and the frequency of these losses per business line and risk type. This information is useful to the risk manager because it highlights where their attention should be focused. The mathematical problem in each case is similar to that of reconstructing a joint probability from its marginals. We solve this problem by minimizing a convex objective function (which happens to be an entropy of the Fermi–Dirac type) subject to the appropriate constraints. The method is nonparametric and model-free, and therefore it does not require parameters to be fitted to the data. If we think of the joint losses as the values of a random variable, and of the joint probabilities as the probabilities of obtaining these values, we can then use the tabulated data to compute expected losses as well as risk measures such as value-at-risk and expected shortfall.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7960716
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2025-01/jop_Arratia_online_early.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7960716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.