IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7960306.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A qualitative study of operational resilience in financial institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Sharada Iyer
  • George del Hierro Jr
  • Indira Guzman

Abstract

Large financial institutions such as investment banks, retail banks and insurance companies, also known as global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), can cease to perform their critical functions when faced with major disaster events. Events such as widespread technology outages, cyber attacks and global pandemics could have a far-reaching impact, threatening the viability of these firms, as seen in the 2007–9 global financial crisis. New regulatory requirements put forth by the Bank of England and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel III) require G-SIBs to have sound operational resilience practices for their business services. These are due to be implemented in phases by 2025. While the concept of operational resilience is not new, companies have traditionally approached it separately and as needed for specific business functions. The new requirements necessitate G-SIBs look at sustainable solutions more holistically to protect their end customers and shareholders. Our study leverages survey-style qualitative research methodology: it harnesses candid and pragmatic feedback from a sample of 21 G-SIB employees to formulate recommendations for this specific aspect of regulatory requirements. Given our findings, we encourage G-SIBs to take an open-minded approach

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7960306
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2024-11/jop_Iyer_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7960306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.