Author
Listed:
- Ruben D Cohen
- Jonathan Humphries
- Jia Lu
Abstract
Insurance can effectively mitigate significant operational risks. However, not all losses are insurable, and payments of covered losses are not generally reimbursed in full for reasons including the chosen limits of cover as well as risks or exposures that may be excluded from the coverage. When incorporating insurance into a firm’s operational risk model, the risk mitigation calculation needs to appropriately reflect the insurance coverage afforded in a framework that is well reasoned and documented, demonstrating that the calculation is timely aligned to the institution’s operational risk profile, and that the institution’s methodology for recognizing insurance captures all the relevant elements through discounts or haircuts in the amount of insurance recognition. Haircuts (or discounts) can emanate from, for example, mismatches in cover, uncertainty over payment and policy terms and conditions, all of which are often difficult to estimate because of the ambiguities around policy coverage and terms and conditions when considered in the context of operational risk loss events. A dominant source of these haircuts is policy wording, which consists of the insuring clauses, definitions and exclusions that define the scope of coverage. In insurance modeling, the effects of these haircuts are generally lumped into a single parameter known as the probability of insurance recovery (PoIR). Given the apparent lack of any previous modeling efforts in the public domain that aim to estimate the PoIR, we must start somewhere. The aim of this paper is to introduce an underlying methodology. We first address the building blocks of the PoIR and then integrate them into the risk taxonomy of a firm or unit of measure with a view to incorporating the outcome into the insurance and capital models.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ3:7959042
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7959042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.