IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7958131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the correlation between operational risk loss categories over different time horizons

Author

Listed:
  • Maurice L. Brown
  • Cheng Ly

Abstract

Operational risk is challenging to quantify because of the broad range of categories it encompasses (eg, fraud, technological issues, natural disasters) and the heavy-tailed nature of realized losses. Operational risk modeling requires quantifying how these broad loss categories are related. We focus on the issue of loss frequencies having different timescales (eg, daily, monthly or yearly) and, in particular, on estimating the statistics of losses over arbitrary time horizons. We present a frequency model whereby mathematical techniques can feasibly be applied to analytically calculate means, variances and covariances that are more accurate than those achieved by time-consuming Monte Carlo simulations. We show that the analytic calculations of cumulative loss statistics in an arbitrary time window, which would otherwise be intractable due to temporal correlations, are feasible under our model. Our work has potential value because these statistics are crucial for approximating correlations of losses via copulas. We systematically vary all model parameters to demonstrate the accuracy of our methods for calculating all first- and second-order statistics of aggregate loss distributions. Finally, using combined data from a consortium of institutions, we show that different time horizons can lead to a wide range of loss statistics that can significantly affect calculations of capital requirements.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7958131
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-11/jop_ly_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7958131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.