IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7957503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating text mining and analytic hierarchy process risk assessment with knowledge graphs for operational risk analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzhen Ji
  • Xuhai Duan
  • Dirk Pons
  • Yong Chen
  • Zhi Pei

Abstract

Learning from the past can be invaluable in enhancing risk resilience and developing prevention strategies. One common approach to investigating operational risks is analyzing safety records, which contain various incident data. However, traditional operational risk analysis methods have several limitations. The first significant drawback is that safety records are often documented as unstructured or semistructured data, and the database can be enormous, making it challenging to extract risk information efficiently. Further, the traditional risk assessment method per the ISO 31000 standard is qualitative and subjective, which can lead to inconsistent and inaccurate risk computation, especially when dealing with hazards that have multidimensional consequences. To address these issues, a new method, called the risk-based knowledge graph (RKG), is developed in this paper. The RKG method integrates text mining and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) risk assessment with knowledge graphs for operational risk analysis. This approach provides a systematic method for industrial practitioners to examine operational risk by using AHP risk assessment and graphical semantic networks to illustrate cause-and-effect relationships between risk entities. The use of text mining improves the efficiency of risk information extraction, while the use of AHP risk assessment enhances the consistency and accuracy of risk computation. To evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of RKG, a case study of a computer numerical control manufacturer is conducted. Overall, the RKG method shows promise in addressing the limitations of traditional operational risk analysis methods. It provides a more efficient and accurate way to extract and analyze risk information, making it easier for industrial practitioners to evaluate and manage risks associated with complex hazards.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7957503
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-09/jop_ji_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7957503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.