IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7956129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit committee characteristics and the audit report lag in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Michail Nerantzidis
  • George Drogalas
  • Themistokles Lazarides
  • Evangelos Chytis
  • Dimitris Mitskinis

Abstract

We review prior empirical studies that investigate the effect of audit committee characteristics on audit report lag and provide insights about this corpus of scholarly literature. We also determine whether these audit committees’ compositional features are associated with audit report lag in the context of an emerging market (Greece). Using a unique set of data hand-collected from the annual reports for 130 firms listed on the Athens Stock Exchange, a multiple regression analysis is conducted to identify and explain this association. This analysis identifies the four audit committee characteristics most frequently mentioned in the literature. By empirically examining these, we demonstrate that audit committee diligence is associated with a shorter audit report lag. The results generally satisfy a number of alternative benchmark tests that control for different types of proxies and transformations of audit report lag. Our results could assist practitioners and/or policy makers in perceiving the efficacy of audit committee diligence as a means to improve the timeliness of financial reporting. This is, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the first study that provides a synopsis of the prior literature and examines this relationship in the Greek context.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7956129
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-03/jop_Drogalas_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7956129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.