IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7955253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling very large losses. II

Author

Listed:
  • Henryk Gzyl

Abstract

This paper is a follow-up to the author’s 2018 paper in The Journal of Operational Risk (Volume 13, Issue 2, pages 83–91), the underlying idea of which was that very large operational risk losses should be aggregated to standard losses as a model extension. The latter are the losses described by risk type and business line in the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) classification, observed and duly recorded. A very large loss, when observed, might fit into one of the cells of the BIS classification, but we would not consider that it is caused by the same risk factors as the other losses in that cell. A pending detail in that paper is how to estimate the frequency of very large losses. Here we propose an approach to estimate very large losses similar to that used by Fermi and Drake to estimate the existence of extraterrestrial life. It consists of supposing the event of interest is the result of a concatenation of independent factors and estimating the probability of each factor. The problem is that the events in the causal chain might be events that have never been observed, which ties our subject to that of the estimation of probabilities of rare events. The other issue we address is how to take into account the existence of outliers in the standard losses. These outliers might be comparable with very large losses and have frequencies of occurrence similar to those of rare events. This must be taken into account when computing the value-at-risk of the full loss distribution.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7955253
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-01/jop_gzyl_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7955253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.