IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7877796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key impact deep dive (KIDD)

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Umande

Abstract

We propose an approach for assessing extreme impacts in a way that is simple and transparent. The proposal is based on undertaking a key impact deep dive (KIDD). This paper focuses on the application of a KIDD to assessing extreme operational risk losses in the banking sector and within the context of assessing operational risk capital. However, a KIDD has broader applications. For instance, it can be used as part of a stress test in any type of institution. Further, a KIDD can be generalized and applied to other risks (eg, credit and market risk) and other impact types such as brand damage, length of time without access to critical systems, loss of customers, staff morale, etc. A KIDD assessment has advantages over some established approaches for assessing extreme risks. For example, applying a KIDD approach can lead to increased business engagement and can reduce the number of full-time equivalent hours required to assess operational risk capital, since, unlike some of the established approaches used, such as in the banking sector, a KIDD does not require the use of sophisticated models. Further, a KIDD only requires a business to focus on analyzing a small number of impact types that are considered the most harmful to the business, instead of needing to quantify a potentially large set of risks or scenarios, as is often the practice. In the context of operational risk, the KIDD approach is predicated on the premise that extreme operational risk losses tend to be driven by a single large event and that operational risk losses are driven by only a small number of loss types.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7877796
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2021-10/Key_impact_deep_dive_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7877796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.