IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7822071.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic cost of a fat finger mistake: a comparative case study from Samsung Securities’s ghost stock blunder

Author

Listed:
  • Yongkil Ahn

Abstract

This paper quantifies the economic cost of Samsung Securities’s ghost stock blunder using the synthetic control method. As the financial world becomes more computer based, sudden price fluctuations caused by unintended human input errors appear to be happening more frequently. Samsung Securities, the Samsung conglomerate’s stock trading arm, mistakenly distributed shares worth over US$100 billion to its employees on April 6, 2018, due to a keyboard input error. The difficult process of finding a proper control group plagues comparative case studies. This study overcomes that hurdle by constructing a synthetic version of the event firm. It turns out that the company lost 12.17% (US$428 million) of its pre-event market capitalization, 3000 times the direct loss incurred, due to a fat finger mistake. The results highlight the importance of surveillance in curtailing unintended human errors such as incorrect keyboard inputs or mouse misclicks. Regulatory bodies should monitor financial institutions for their unintended errors and internal control systems.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7822071
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2021-10/The_economic_cost_of_a_fat_finger_mistake_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7822071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.