IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7812371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of culture upon operational risk management guidelines in the banking sector of selected Asian countries

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Mocanu

Abstract

For banks, operational risk losses are likely to have a significant impact not only on their financial condition, but also on their reputation. This makes operational risk management (ORM) particularly important. In relation to ORM, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision promotes a banking supervision policy based on the idea of “enforced self-regulation†. Thus, the central banks of different countries regulate ORM according to the specificities of their national banking industry. This paper tests the hypothesis that such regulatory openness results in legal texts that are highly influenced by the culture of the country in which each central bank issuing guidelines on ORM is located. The author analyzes a corpus of approximately 50 000 words that feature in ORM guidelines published in English by the central banks of China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Singapore and South Korea. By applying the Kendall coefficient, the following significant correlations have been found: (a) the higher the masculinity dimension, the less clear the text; and (b) the higher the masculinity dimension, the less prescriptive the text. Moreover, our content analysis reveals that each operational risk-related item has a different weight in the guidelines;of different countries. The research results should be useful to regulators looking to fine-tune their decisions in different cultural environments.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7812371
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2021-03/The_impact_of_culture_upon_ORM_guidelines_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7812371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.