IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7696246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the source of information influence depositors’ withdrawal intentions during operational events?

Author

Listed:
  • Suné Ferreira
  • Zandri Dickason-Koekemoer

Abstract

Evolving globalization has made South African banks more efficient and more diverse, giving them the chance to capture new opportunities. However, as banks extend their global reach and grasp these new opportunities, more risk is attached. Advances in technology and the radical spur of social media have changed the manner and speed with which information flows. Depositors base their perceptions (subjective in nature) of a bank on recent information (from various sources) and have the power to ensure or erode the continuity of a bank. Depositor intentions may differ based on their demographics, perception, risk tolerance level or the behavioral finance biases toward which they are subject. However, research is limited when considering how depositors react to risk based on different sources of information. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to identify whether depositors’ intentions to withdraw funds during operational risk events differ based on the source of information. The top three sources of information as chosen by depositors are television broadcasts, printed media and online media. Independent t-tests are performed based on whether depositors chose a particular source of information or not. Depositors will react differently (ie, will be more likely to withdraw funds) when hearing about internal fraud; faulty clients, products or business practices; or damage to physical assets and reputational events from printed media rather than from other sources of information. Concerning depositors’ intentions to withdraw during operational risk events, depositors will not act any differently when hearing about these events from a television broadcast or online media. The novelty of this research paper hinges on the contribution of whether operational events influence depositors’ decisions and which forms of communication channel should be used by banks when building their reputations to mitigate the negative consequences of operational events or to manage a crisis.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7696246
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2020-12/Does_the_source_of_information_influence_depositors_withdrawal_intentions.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7696246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.