IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7659036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking operational risk stress testing models

Author

Listed:
  • Filippo Curti
  • Marco Migueis
  • Robert Stewart

Abstract

The Federal Reserve System's Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) requires large bank holding companies to project operational losses under stressed macroeconomic scenarios, such as deep recessions characterized by high unemployment. However, the relationship between macroeconomic downturns and operational losses is influenced by innumerable factors, which are challenging to quantify and difficult to forecast. Therefore, the models designed to measure stressed operational losses are simplifications of complex processes, so multiple benchmarks should be used to guide primary model development. When modeling highly uncertain processes, benchmarks provide different conceptions allowing for alternative perspectives and reasoned judgments. This paper outlines several approaches to benchmarking operational loss projections under stressed scenarios using both accounting metrics and historical loss experience. These benchmarks provide a tool for bankers, regulators and practitioners to gauge the reasonableness and conservatism inherent in stressed operational loss projections, thus bringing a concrete structure and a panoramic view to the operational risk CCAR process.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7659036
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2020-07/Benchmarking_operational_risk_stress_testing_models.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7659036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.