IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7650051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An emergent taxonomy for operational risk: capturing the wisdom of crowds

Author

Listed:
  • Luke Carrivick
  • Steve Bishop
  • Tom Ivell
  • Valerie Wong
  • Ramy Farha

Abstract

There has been a substantial change in the operational risks faced by financial services firms over the last fifteen years. Risks such as conduct, cyber and third party have risen in importance and now dominate boardroom agendas. How organizations think about this expanding portfolio of threats and manage them in a consistent way is underpinned by their risk taxonomy. This changing risk profile, combined with a recent shift of focus away from capital measurement toward risk management, means that many organizations are actively revising their operational risk taxonomies. In doing so, they are deviating from Basel Committee on Banking Supervision event types, but without a common standard for which to aim. In this paper, we take a data-driven approach and combine the individual active taxonomies of sixty large financial institutions (fifty-eight for construction and two for validation) to create a coherent new reference taxonomy: the ORX reference taxonomy for operational and nonfinancial risk. This combines both the theoretical and the practical wisdom of the crowd. The resultant taxonomy is a two-layered hierarchy of risks, with sixteen risks at level 1 and sixty-one risks at level 2. As part of this work, we look at some of the contemporary concerns that have shaped how institutions think about their risks. Constructing a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive taxonomy driven by data is not without its challenges, and the careful narrowing of scope and separation of risks, in partnership with industry experts, was sometimes needed. The Basel event types provide a central point of comparison, as they are universally adopted, have longevity and provide a basis for the ways in which institutions share data and provide insights into operational risks. The desired contribution of this ORX initiative was to create a common point of reference and thereby solid ground for industry discussion about developing operational risk taxonomies with the aim of laying the foundations that will allow consistent industry sharing of insights and data over the coming years.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7650051
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2020-07/An_emergent_taxonomy_for_operational_risk.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7650051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.