IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/6726531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The operational risk disclosure practices of banks: evidence from India and Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Muneesh Kumar
  • Harshmeeta Kaur Soni
  • Mihaela Mocanu

Abstract

The disclosure of information by banks is beneficial to several categories of the public as well as to the stability of the financial system. Operational risk disclosures are particularly important, since operational losses may impact both the financial condition and the reputation of banks. This paper compares the levels of operational risk disclosure in the banking industries of India and Romania. We develop an unweighted disclosure index with forty-three items, with data collected from the 2015 annual reports of all commercial banks in India and Romania. We then perform a regression analysis to investigate the extent to which banks’ characteristics impact the level of operational risk disclosure in these two countries. First, our results reveal a similarly low level of disclosure, namely an overall index average of 27% in the case of India and of 29% in the case of Romania. These results are surprising, as India’s culture appears to be more inclined toward transparency than Romania’s. Second, our results point toward a positive association between bank size and the level of operational risk disclosure. This paper contributes to the existing body of research, which comprises few empirical studies on the particular topic of operational risk disclosure in banks.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:6726531
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2019-06/The_operational_risk_disclosure_practices_of_banks.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:6726531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.