IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/6383401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational risk measurement: a loss distribution approach with segmented dependence

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqian Zhu
  • Yinghui Wang
  • Jianping Li

Abstract

In the loss distribution approach (LDA), the most widely used approach of operational risk measurement, the modeling dependencies across different risk cells have been extensively studied. However, it has not been recognized that the dependencies between high-frequency, low-impact (HFLI) and low-frequency, high-impact (LFHI) operational risk losses are naturally different. This paper proposes an approach, called the loss distribution approach with segmented dependence (LDA-SD), which can model the different dependencies of HFLI and LFHI losses in the framework of LDA. LDA-SD divides the losses into two parts for HFLI and LFHI, fits their frequency and severity distributions separately and models the segmented dependencies with a copula. In our empirical study, the proposed LDA-SD is applied to measure the operational risk of the overall Chinese banking sector based on the Chinese Operational Loss Database data set, the largest operational risk data set in China. The empirical results reveal that the dependencies are indeed different between HFLI and LFHI losses. The operational risk capital calculated by the LDA-SD is significantly;smaller than that calculated by the LDA and considering the holistic dependence, but larger than that simply considering tail dependence.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:6383401
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2019-03/Operational_risk_measurement_an_LDA_with_segmented_dependence.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:6383401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.