IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/5360471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standardized measurement approach extension to integrate insurance deduction into operational risk capital requirement

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Piacenza
  • Claudia Belloni

Abstract

The consultative document issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in March 2016 proposes the withdrawal of internal modeling for operational risk regulatory capital and describes the new proposed methodology for calculating operational risk capital requirement: the standardized measurement approach (SMA). One of the main problems with the SMA is that it does not allow the inclusion of insurance coverage as capital requirement deduction. As a direct consequence, the SMA offers no incentives to invest in insurance coverage in order to keep the risk profile under control. Even the incentive to invest in other mitigation actions is reduced, since forward-looking components are not considered and it takes several years to significantly affect the SMA capital requirement through loss reduction. This paper describes a possible proposal to extend the SMA to include insurance coverage. The operational risk capital-at-risk (OpCaR) model, probably the same one used to calibrate the SMA, is a natural choice for integrating insurance coverage into the extended SMA. The OpCaR model is defined and used by regulators, and it can be easily implemented by all banks, as it is clearly described in the BCBS consultative paper “Operational risk: revisions to the simpler approaches†.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:5360471
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2017-11/Standardized_measurement_approach_extension.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:5360471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.