IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2435289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Random matrix theory applied to correlations in operational risk

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Clauss
  • Jiali Xu
  • Sophie Lavaud
  • David Cressey
  • François Crénin

Abstract

ABSTRACT Measuring correlations among aggregate operational risk losses has a significant impact on calculating regulatory operational risk capital requirements. In the literature, these correlations are often summarized by their average and exhibit a low level. In this paper, we go beyond the average of correlations and we focus on their distribution. We show that this distribution could present some noise because of the structure of the data of operational risk losses. Consequently, pairwise correlations estimation and diversification benefits could lack accuracy. Supervisory guidelines from the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision for the advanced measurement approach address the issue of the soundness and integrity of the correlation estimates. We propose a sound analysis framework based on random matrix theory to control the real levels of observed pairwise correlations and avoid focusing only on correlations average. We first study the relevant application of this asymptotic theory to small samples. We then determine this improved estimation of observed correlations on a leading operational loss data consortium. In general, we find strong evidence to reduce the volatility of the correlations distribution that provides sounder correlation estimates.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2435289
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/9330/Random_matrix_theory_applied_to_correlations_in_operational_risk.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2435289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.