IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2367631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The mutual-information-based variance–covariance approach: an application to operational risk aggregation in Chinese banking

Author

Listed:
  • Jianping Li, Xiaoqian Zhu, Yongjia Xie, Jianming Chen, Lijun Gao, Jichuang Feng, and Wujiang Shi

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most advanced measurement approaches cannot simultaneously capture the overall dependence between operational risk components and be easy to use and understand. This paper proposes a mutual information-based variance covariance approach that is able to capture the overall correlation and is also highly tractable. Specifically, we replace the linear correlation coefficient with the global correlation coefficient in the framework of the variance-covariance approach. Originating from the theory of mutual information, the global correlation coefficient is able to capture both linear and nonlinear correlation relationships. The value-at-risk (VaR) of each individual risk component is calculated; these VaRs are then aggregated by using the global correlation coefficient. In empirical analysis, the proposed approach is employed to aggregate the operational risk of Chinese banking across business lines, based on the most comprehensive (to the best of our knowledge) operational risk data set. After an overall comparison with results from other correlation; assumptions and the actual capital allocation of Chinese banking in 2013, we conclude that the actual capital allocation in China at present is not effective, and the aggregate VaR calculated from our approach is more reasonable.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2367631
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/8308/jop_li2_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2367631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.