Author
Abstract
ABSTRACT A fundamental component in the modeling of a financial risk exposure is the estimation of the probability distribution function that best describes the true data-generation process of independent and extreme loss events that fall above a certain threshold. In this paper, the authors assume that, above the threshold, the extreme loss events are explained by an extreme value distribution. For that purpose, they apply the classical peaks-over-threshold method in extreme-value statistics. According to that approach, data in excess of a certain threshold is asymptotically described by a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD). Consequently, establishing a mechanism to estimate this threshold is of major importance. The current methods to estimate the thresholds are based on a subjective inspection of mean excess plots or other statistical measures; the Hill estimator, for example, leads to an undesirable level of subjectivity. In this paper, an innovative mechanism is proposed that increases the level of objectivity of threshold selection, departing from a subjective and imprecise eyeballing of charts. The proposed algorithm is based on the properties of the generalized Pareto distribution and considers the choice of threshold to be an important modeling decision that can have significant impact on the model outcomes. The algorithm they introduce here is based on the Hausman specification test to determine the threshold, which maintains proper specification so that the other parameters of the distribution can be estimated without compromising the balance between bias and variance. The authors apply the test to real risk data so that they can obtain a practical example of the improvements the process will bring. Results show that the Hausman test is a valid mechanism for estimating the GPD threshold and can be seen as a relevant enhancement in the objectivity of the entire process.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ3:2350138
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2350138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.