IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2330852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limit of diversification: a lower bound on firm-wide operational risk capital

Author

Listed:
  • Emre Balta and Matthias Degen

Abstract

The quantification of diversification benefit plays a critical role in quantitative risk models, especially within the context of regulatory and economic capital. However, the complexity of today's risk landscape, together with the associated uncertainty surrounding the modeling of dependencies makes quantitative analysis of diversification a challenging task. By using well-known mathematical results, we provide a lower bound on the risk concentration RC (which we define as 1 minus the diversification benefit) in the presence of dependent underlying risk factors. Our methodology quantifies the modeling uncertainty by providing a lower bound for the RC, and hence a theoretical lower bound for the firm-wide advanced measurement approach (AMA) capital. In other words, we quantify the RC under VaRa for the least conservative case, even when we cannot define what the least conservative scenario would be. Finally, we apply this framework to operational risk and provide bank supervisors a potential tool to benchmark and rank order the RC that the banks report for their operational risk AMA capital. We show that the aggregation methods are overly reliant on modeling choices and assumptions, and that some of the banks have very aggressive reduction in firm-wide operational risk capital. Please click here to download PDF

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2330852
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/7552/jop_balta_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2330852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.