IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2275707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the operational risk of Chinese commercial banks using the semilinear credibility model

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Lu, Lei Guo and Xing Liu

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chinese commercial banks have faced increasingly serious operational risks because of the rapid development of the financial markets and the wide application of information technology. Stringent requirements should be met to address these risks and to ensure reliable operational risk measurement. However, inadequate internal loss data of banks affects the accurate measurement of operational risk. In this study, we improve how the threshold of extreme value theory can be determined and use semilinear credibility theory, a widely employed theory in the non-life-insurance field, to address the problem on operational risk measurement. We combine commercial banks' data on internal operational risk loss and external loss to address the lack of data. We also perform an empirical analysis based on loss data from 1990 to 2011 and identify the operational risk capital of individual banks. The results obtained could serve as valuable references that benefit banking supervision. ;

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Lu, Lei Guo and Xing Liu, . "Measuring the operational risk of Chinese commercial banks using the semilinear credibility model," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2275707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/6771/jop_lu_web.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2275707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.