IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2207251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating operational risk capital: the challenges of truncation, the hazards of maximum likelihood estimation, and the promise of robust statistics

Author

Listed:
  • J.D. Opdyke
  • Alexander Cavallo

Abstract

ABSTRACT In operational risk measurement, the estimation of severity distribution parameters is the main driver of capital estimates, yet this remains a; nontrivial challenge for many reasons. Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) does not adequately meet this challenge because of its well-documented nonrobustness to modest violations of idealized textbook model assumptions: specifically, that the data is independent and identically distributed (iid), which is clearly violated by operational loss data. Yet, even using iid data, capital estimates based on MLE are biased upward, sometimes dramatically, due to Jensen's inequality. This overstatement of the true risk profile increases as the heaviness of the severity distribution tail increases, so dealing with data collection thresholds by using truncated distributions, which have thicker tails, increases MLE-related capital bias considerably. Truncation also augments correlation between a distribution's parameters, and this exacerbates the nonrobustness of MLE. This paper derives influence functions for MLE for a number of severity distributions, both truncated and not, to analytically demonstrate its nonrobustness and its sometimes counterintuitive behavior under truncation. Empirical influence functions are then used to compare MLE with robust alternatives such as the optimally bias-robust estimator (OBRE) and the Cramér-von Mises estimator. The ultimate focus, however, is on the economic and regulatory capital estimates generated by these three estimators. The mean adjusted single-loss approximation is used to translate these parameter estimates into value-at-risk-based estimates of regulatory and economic capital. The results show that OBREs are very promising alternatives to MLE for use with actual operational loss event data, whether truncated or not, when the ultimate goal is to obtain accurate (nonbiased) and robust capital estimates.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2207251
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/5856/jop_opdyke_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2207251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.