IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2186729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A combination model for operational risk estimation in a Chinese banking industry case

Author

Listed:
  • Jichuang Feng, Jianping Li, Lijun Gao and Zhongsheng Hua

Abstract

ABSTRACT The loss distribution approach is widely used in operational risk estimation. While the detailed form of frequency distribution does not significantly affect risk analysis, the choice of model in terms of severity often has a significant impact on operational risk measures. Usually, different heavy-tailed distributions, which have their own characteristics, are respectively used to quantify operational risk. In order to integrate characteristics of different heavy-tailed distributions and to reduce the uncertainty of the operational risk model, we propose a combination model to estimate operational risk in this paper. The model has three stages. First, we estimate operational risk by using different heavy-tailed distributions in the loss distribution approach framework. Second, the weights are decided according to certain criteria, and in this paper, p-values of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test are used to decide the weight of each operational risk. Finally, the results obtained in the previous phases are combined in an integrated estimation to form the final result. We use a linear combination model to measure the operational risk capital of Chinese banks. We also compare the results measured using the combination model with those obtained from the basic indicator approach. Empirical analysis shows that this approach allows capital to be allocated in a more efficient way than the standard approach (only one heavy-tailed distribution used).

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2186729
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/5499/jop_li_web.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2186729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.