IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2160928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multivariate estimation for operational risk with judicious use of extreme value theory

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmoud El-Gamal, Hulusi Inanoglu, Mitch Stengel

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Basel II Accord requires participating banks to quantify operational risk according to a matrix of business lines and event types. Proper modeling of univariate loss distributions and dependence structures across those categories of operational losses is critical for a proper assessment of overall annual operational loss distributions. We illustrate our proposed methodology using Loss Data Collection Exercise 2004 (LDCE 2004) data on operational losses across five loss event types.We estimate a multivariate likelihood-based statistical model, which illustrates the benefits and risks of using extreme value theory (EVT) in modeling univariate tails of event type loss distributions. We find that abandoning EVT leads to unacceptably low estimates of risk capital requirements, while indiscriminate use of EVT to all data leads to unacceptably high estimates. The judicious middle approach is to use EVT where dictated by data, and after separating clear outliers that need to be modeled via probabilistic scenario analysis. We illustrate all of the computational steps in the estimation of marginal distributions and copula with an application to one bank’s data (disguising magnitudes to ensure that bank’s anonymity). The methods we use to overcome heretofore unexplored technical problems in the estimation of codependence across risk types scales easily to larger models, encompassing not only operational, but also other types of risk.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160928
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4745/jop_v2n1a2.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.