IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2160920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust estimation of operational risk

Author

Listed:
  • Nataliya Horbenko, Peter Ruckdeschel, Taehan Bae

Abstract

ABSTRACT According to the loss distribution approach, the operational risk of a bank is determined as the 99.9% quantile of the respective loss distribution, covering unexpected severe events. The 99.9% quantile can be considered a tail event. As supported by the Pickands-Balkema-de Haan theorem, tail events exceeding some high threshold are usually modeled using a generalized Pareto distribution (GPD). Estimation of GPD tail quantiles is not a trivial task, particularly if we take into account the heavy tails of this distribution, the possibility of singular outliers, and, moreover, the fact that data is usually pooled among several sources. In such situations, robust methods may provide stable estimates in situations where classical methods fail. In this paper, the optimally robust procedures "most bias-robust estimator", "optimal mean squared error estimator" and "radiusminimax estimator" are introduced to the application domain of operational risk. We apply these procedures to parameter estimation of a GPD from data from Algorithmics Inc. To better understand these results, supportive diagnostic plots adjusted for this context (influence plots, outlyingness plots and QQ plots with robust confidence bands) are provided.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160920
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4737/jop_v6n2a1.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.