IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2160917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of tail performance of the Champernowne transformed kernel density estimator, the generalized Pareto distribution and the g-and-h distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Tine Buch-Kroman

Abstract

ABSTRACT Several papers have recommended the Champernowne distribution to describe operational risk losses. This paper compares the tail performance of the Champernowne transformed kernel density estimator, the generalized Pareto distribution (GPD) and the g-and-h distribution. We introduce a new tail-dependent parameter estimation method for the Champernowne distribution, computed by conditional maximum likelihood, and show that, by using this new method, we obtain an estimator that in general outperforms the benchmark estimators with respect to tail performance. At the same time the new estimator provides a density estimate on the entire axis superior to the g-and-h distribution, and unlike the GPD estimator, which provides a density estimate only above the threshold. The estimators performances are investigated in a Monte Carlo simulation study, and their application to operational risk is illustrated.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160917
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4734/jop_v4n2a3.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.