IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2160902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can the single-loss approximation method compete with the standard monte carlo simulation technique?

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Hess

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper we evaluate the single-loss approximation method for high-quantile loss estimation on the basis of SAS OpRisk Global Data. Due to its simplicity, the single-loss approximation method has become a popular tool for capital requirement calculation purposes in the financial services industry. As the single-loss approximation method requires some strict assumptions, the naive use of this method was criticized in a 2010 paper by Degen. Although we support this criticism, the single-loss approximation method yields astonishingly exact results for the underlying data set and our calibrated heavy-tailed lognormal loss severity model. We show in this paper that the value-at-risk (VaR) estimates by the single-loss approximation method are more accurate than the quantile estimates computed by a Monte Carlo simulation with one million losses. However, we find a significant 99.9%VaR underestimation for a medium-tailed gamma loss severity model.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160902
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4719/jop_v6n2a2.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.