IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2160871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sanctions screening - the quest for efficiency and effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • John Evans

Abstract

ABSTRACT Regulators are having to clamp down further with more stringent demands for payments filtering and higher fines for violations. With between 3% and 6% of all payments appearing to be high risk and therefore requiring significant anti-money laundering resources to investigate, this is an issue that will affect all banks. Not only do they now have to adhere to tougher regimes, but the subsequent operational burden is vast. This paper discusses the range of regulations and regulatory bodies in place and the challenges faced by financial institutions due to the fragmented nature of the sanctions screening landscape. From there, the paper looks at the operational burden then created by the combination of increased regulation and higher volumes of payments needing to be scanned. It also highlights pitfalls of spiralling sanctions screening budgets when increasing the amount of payments scanned and the risks of fines should any illegal payments be missed. Finally, a solution that allows institutions to effectively and efficiently scan all relevant payments, without massively increasing spend, is recommended.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160871
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4688/jop_v5n3a3.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.