IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/2160854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transform approach for operational risk modeling: value-at-risk and tail conditional expectation

Author

Listed:
  • Jiwook Jang, Genyuan Fu

Abstract

ABSTRACT To quantify the aggregate losses from operational risk, we employ an actuarial risk model, ie, we consider the compound Cox model of operational risk to deal with the stochastic nature of its frequency rate in real situations. A shot noise process is used for this purpose. A compound Poisson model is also considered as its counterpart for the case where the operational loss frequency rate is deterministic. As the loss amounts arising due to mismanagement of operational risks are extremes in practice, we assume the loss sizes are log gamma, Fréchet and truncated Gumbel. We also use an exponential distribution for the case of non-extreme losses. Employing a loss distribution approach, we derive the analytical/explicit forms of the Laplace transform of the distribution of aggregate operational losses. The value-at-risk (VaR) and tail conditional expectation (TCE, also known as TailVaR) are used to evaluate the operational risk capital charge. Fast Fourier transform is used to approximate VaR and TCE numerically and the figures of the distributions of aggregate operational losses are provided. Numerical comparisons of VaR and TCE obtained using two compound processes are also made.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiwook Jang, Genyuan Fu, . "Transform approach for operational risk modeling: value-at-risk and tail conditional expectation," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4671/jop_v3n2a3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:2160854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.