Author
Listed:
- Kang Hua Cao
- Han Qi
- Chen-Hao Tsai
- Chi Keung Woo
- Jay Zarnikau
Abstract
The efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is a fundamental tenet of active and unfettered market trading. The EMH for intertemporal trading of a commodity such as natural gas implies that today’s futures price is an unbiased predictor of a future delivery period’s spot price and that the difference between today’s futures and spot prices reflects the commodity’s cost of carrying. The EMH for inter-regional trading requires the commodity’s regional price difference to equal the inter-regional transportation cost. Using regional hourly data for January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2020 from the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), we investigate whether the EMH is empirically valid in all ERCOT’s wholesale electricity markets and, if not, the extent of ERCOT’s energy trading inefficiency and what can be done to reduce it. By estimating a parsimonious system of eight price-level regressions and four price-difference regressions, we reject the interday EMH for all regions and the inter-regional EMH for all regional market pairs. However, ERCOT’s extent of trading inefficiency is mild when compared to the wholesale energy prices. Our empirical examples have two policy implications: enhancing ERCOT’s interday trading efficiency entails improving the day-ahead forecasts for solar and wind generation and refining ERCOT’s indicative real-time market prices, while enhancing ERCOT’s inter-regional trading efficiency requires transmission capacity expansion to reduce transmission congestion and line losses.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:rsk:journ2:7955056
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:7955056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-energy-markets .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.