IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ2/7815321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal electricity distribution pricing under risk and high photovoltaics penetration

Author

Listed:
  • Maxim Bichuch
  • Benjamin Hobbs
  • Xinyue Song
  • Yijiao Wang

Abstract

We model a hierarchical Stackelberg game in a competitive power market under high behind-the-meter photovoltaics penetration and demand-side uncertainty, with emphasis on the feedback loop between distributed generation via photovoltaics and power prices. The Stackelberg leader, who is the government regulator, attempts to define a set of network tariffs that results in maximal overall system net benefits with respect to consumer utility, cost recovery and renewable energy promotion. The Stackelberg followers, who are rational consumers of electricity, choose their individual photovoltaics investments in order to maximize their personal utilities. With the consumers’ demand evolution described by a discretized Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, we find a closed-form approximation to the consumer’s utility, and the existence of a game equilibrium between all the consumers and the regulator. Numerical results are calibrated to PJM power market data, and illustrate the market participants’ coupled decisions. Our results suggest that consumers tend to rely more on photovoltaics when the market demand is more volatile, with potential risks of the utility death spiral where the high electricity retail price resulting from increased distributed generation incentivizes further photovoltaics investment.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:7815321
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2021-04/Optimal_electricity_distribution_pricing_under_risk_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:7815321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-energy-markets .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.