IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ2/7010701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new approach to evaluating the cost-efficiency of complex hedging strategies: an application to electricity price–volume quanto contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Sang Baum Kang
  • Michael Ong
  • Jialin Zhao

Abstract

Electricity quanto contracts improve the efficiency of financial risk management by accommodating the correlated price and volumetric risks of energy suppliers. The use of electricity quanto contracts, however, suffers from the high risk premiums associated with such tailor-made and illiquid financial instruments. As a result, it is of great interest to properly evaluate the cost-efficiency of these complex hedging deals. To address this concern, we propose a new hedging assessment model, the economic value of the incremental expected shortfall (EVIES), from a cost-efficiency perspective. Using EVIES, we develop a Monte Carlo simulation-based hedging framework. This framework overcomes the limits of traditional models by not resting on risk neutrality, market completeness or unobservable inputs. In our numerical examples, we assume that a fictitious power supplier has access to electricity price derivatives, weather derivatives and electricity quanto contracts, and we show that our proposed model can be applied to (1) construct a cost-effective hedge against an electricity price–volume joint risk, (2) find a partial equilibrium for the valuation of electricity quanto contracts and (3) locate hedging solutions for achieving a specific risk management target.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:7010701
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2019-09/Evaluate_cost_efficiency_of_complex_hedges_0.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:7010701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-energy-markets .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.