IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ2/6022476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A real option analysis on retiring existing coal-fired electricity plants in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Sang Baum Kang
  • Pascal Letourneau
  • Steve Sala

Abstract

To reduce carbon;dioxide emissions from the electricity generation sector, the United States introduced the Clean Power Plan (CPP) in 2015. Specifically, building block #2 aimed to replace coal-fired electricity generation with natural-gas-fired generation. In 2017, the US federal government decided not to honor the United Nations’ Paris Agreement and repealed the CPP. In this paper, we study the conditions under which a reasonable green policy by a US state encourages the early replacement of existing coal plants with new natural ;gas plants,;as CPP building block #2 suggested. Using a real option model, we calculate the probability ;that a firm makes an investment decision to retire an existing coal plant and build a new natural gas plant within the next few years. We find that the results critically depend on the remaining useful life of the existing coal plant. When the remaining life is short, government policies do not play a significant;role in this asset replacement decision. However, if the remaining useful life is approximately twenty-plus years,a state government’s green policy does play a significant ;role in the plant’s replacement. Because such plants were built during the “coal plant boom†period from 1965 to 1987, our findings are particularly;relevant.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:6022476
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2018-12/A_real_option_analysis_on_retiring_existing_coal-fired_electricity_plants_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:6022476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-energy-markets .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.