IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ2/5844766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the spatial hedging effectiveness of German wind power futures for wind power generators

Author

Listed:
  • Troels Sønderby Christensen
  • Anca Pircalabu

Abstract

The wind power futures (WPF) recently introduced on the German market fill the gap of a standardized product that directly addresses the volume risk in wind power trading. While, generally speaking, German WPF entail risk-reducing benefits for wind power generators, the extent of these benefits across wind farms with different geographical locations remains unclear. In this paper, we consider the wind utilization in thirty-one different locations in Germany. For each site, we propose a copula model for the joint behavior of the site-specific wind index and the overall German wind index. Our results indicate that static mixture copulas are preferred to the stand- alone copula models usually employed in the economic literature. Further, we find evidence of asymmetric dependence and upper tail dependence. To quantify the benefits of WPF at each wind site, we perform a minimum variance hedge and find that variance reductions can differ greatly depending on the geographical location. Different comparison studies reveal that the presence of (1) a negative risk premium in the WPF market and (2) upper tail dependence weaken the benefits of WPF for wind power generators. ;

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:5844766
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2018-08/On_the_spatial_hedging_effectiveness_of_German_WPF_0.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:5844766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-energy-markets .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.