IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ1/7956241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic class-imbalanced financial distress prediction based on case-based reasoning integrated with time weighting and resampling

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Sun
  • Mingyang Sun
  • Mengru Zhao
  • Yingying Du

Abstract

Existing dynamic class-imbalanced financial distress prediction (FDP) models based on artificial intelligence, such as support vector machines or neural networks, are difficult to understand. Case-based reasoning (CBR) is an artificial intelligence method that is easy for users to understand, but traditional FDP models based on CBR lack mechanisms for treating concept drift and class imbalance. This study explores the construction of a dynamic class-imbalanced CBR FDP model, which consists of four modules (dynamic updates of the case base, class balancing of the case base by resampling, the time weighting of cases and CBR for FDP). It treats financial distress concept drift by dynamically updating the case base and via a time-weighting mechanism, and solves the class imbalance problem by resampling. Empirical experiments based on real-world data from Chinese listed companies show that the proposed dynamic class-imbalanced CBR FDP model outperforms both static and dynamic CBR FDP models without resampling or time weighting. Therefore, the dynamic class-imbalanced CBR FDP model not only gives a satisfying performance by effectively treating the problems of both financial distress concept drift and class imbalance but also has good interpretability in real-world applications, providing corporate managers and other stakeholders with a new risk management tool.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:7956241
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2023-04/jcr_sun_web_final.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:7956241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-credit-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.