IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ1/2474214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further investigation of parametric loss given default modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip Li
  • Min Qi
  • Xiaofei Zhang
  • Xinlei Zhao

Abstract

ABSTRACT We conduct a comprehensive study of some parametric models that are designed to;fit the unusual bounded and bimodal distribution of loss given default (LGD). We;first examine a smearing estimator, a Monte Carlo estimator and a global adjustment;approach to refine transformation regression models that address issues with LGD;boundary values. Although these refinements only marginally improve model performance,;the smearing and Monte Carlo estimators help to reduce the sensitivity;of transformation regressions to the adjustment factor. We then conduct a horse race;among the refined transformation methods, five parametric models that are specifically;suitable for LGD modeling (two-step, inflated beta, Tobit, censored gamma and;two-tiered gamma regressions), fractional response regression and standard linear;regression. We find that the sophisticated parametric models do not clearly outperform;the simpler ones in either predictive accuracy or rank-ordering ability, in-sample,;out-of-sample or out of time. Therefore, it is important for modelers and researchers;to choose the model that is appropriate for their particular data set, considering differences;in model complexity, computational burden, ease of implementation and model;performance.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:2474214
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/10495/Further_investigation_of_parametric_LGD_modeling.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:2474214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-credit-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.