IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ1/2160700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is credit risk really higher in Islamic banks?

Author

Listed:
  • Aniss Boumediene

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper empirically explores the assertion that Islamic banks have higher credit risk than conventional banks. We give definitions, methods for identification and methods for management of credit risk for each Islamic financial tool. This risk is then calculated for nine Islamic banks and nine conventional banks using contingent claims analysis. Merton’s model, based on Black and Scholes’s option pricing formula, is used to measure the distance-to-default, DD, and the default probability, DP from 2005 to 2009. Islamic banks have a mean distance-to-default of 204, significantly higher than conventional banks (DD = 15). The mean default probabilities are 0.03 and 0.05, respectively. Cumulative logistic probability distributions are then used to derive default probability from distanceto- default. These results are more satisfying: the distribution of default probability has larger tails, responding to the criticism of the use of a normal distribution.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:2160700
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/digital_assets/4562/v7n3a4.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:2160700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-credit-risk .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.