IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ0/7398376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extremal risk management: expected shortfall value verification using the bootstrap method

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Malecka

Abstract

In this paper, the authors;refer to the axiomatic theory of risk and investigate the problem of formal verification of the expected shortfall (ES) model based on a sample ES. Recognizing the infeasibility of parametric methods, they;explore the bootstrap technique, which, unlike the current value-at-risk model-based (VaR model-based) Basel III testing framework, permits the creation of more powerful sample ES-based procedures. Their contribution to the debate on the possibilities of sample ES-based testing is twofold. First, the authors introduce a bootstrap test based on the idea of ES prediction corrected variables. In this way, they obtain a procedure that makes no distributional assumptions about the underlying returns process, and whose p-value computation does not assume any asymptotic convergence. Second, they provide a unifying framework for ES value verification, in which they compare alternative sample ES-based approaches: the residual-based procedures versus the ES prediction corrected tests as well as the VaR model-dependent approach versus the fixed failure rate tests. By examining its statistical properties and practical applicability, they find evidence that the proposed bootstrap procedure, based on ES prediction corrected variables, is superior to other methods. This provides important guidance for developing international standards of market risk management.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ0:7398376
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/digital_asset/2020-02/Extremal%20risk%20management%20expected%20shortfall-%20FF.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ0:7398376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-computational-finance .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.