IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ0/2160500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing continuous Asian options: a comparison of Monte Carlo and Laplace transform inversion methods

Author

Listed:
  • Michael C. Fu and Dilip B. Madan, Tong Wang

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, the authors investigate two numerical methods for pricing Asian options: Laplace transform inversion and Monte Carlo simulation. In attempting to numerically invert the Laplace transform of an Asian call option that has been derived previously in the literature, some of the potential difficulties inherent in this approach are indicated. The effectiveness of two easy-to-implement algorithms are investigated. These algorithms provide a cross-check for accuracy and also demonstrate superior precision to two alternatives proposed in the literature for the Asian pricing problem. The theory of Laplace transforms for this problem is extended by deriving the double Laplace transform of the continuous arithmetic Asian option in both its strike and maturity. The authors then contrast this numerical inversion approach with Monte Carlo simulation, one of the most widely used techniques, especially by practitioners, for the valuation of derivative securities. For the Asian option pricing problem, it is shown that this approach will be effective for cases when numerical inversion is likely to be problematic. Ways to improve the precision of the simulation estimates through the judicious use of control variates are considered. In particular, in the problem of correcting the discretization bias inherent in simulation when pricing continuous-time contracts, it is found that the use of suitably biased control variates can be beneficial. This approach is also compared with the use of Richardson extrapolation.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ0:2160500
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4377/v2n2a3b.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ0:2160500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-computational-finance .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.