IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ0/2160439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lognormal approximations to Libor market models

Author

Listed:
  • O. Kurbanmuradov, K. Sabelfeld, J. Schoenmakers

Abstract

ABSTRACT We study several lognormal approximations for Libor market models, where special attention is paid to their simulation by direct methods and lognormal random fields. In contrast to conventional numerical solution of SDEs, this approach simulates the solution directly at a desired point in time and therefore may be more efficient. As such, the proposed approximations provide valuable alternatives to the Euler method, in particular for long-dated instruments. We carry out a pathwise comparison of the different lognormal approximations with the “exact” SDE solution obtained by the Euler scheme using sufficiently small time steps. Also we test approximations obtained via numerical solution of the SDE by the Euler method, using larger time steps. It turns out that, for typical volatilities observed in practice, improved versions of the lognormal approximation proposed by Brace, Gatarek and Musiela (1997) appear to have excellent pathwise accuracy. We found that this accuracy can also be achieved by Euler-stepping the SDE using larger time steps; however, from a comparative cost analysis it follows that, particularly for long-maturity options, the latter method is more time-consuming than the lognormal approximation. We conclude with applications to some example Libor derivatives.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ0:2160439
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.risk.net/system/files/import/protected/digital_assets/4316/jcf_v6n1a4.pdf
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ0:2160439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-computational-finance .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.