IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rse/wpaper/v22y2021i2p113-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Stakeholders’ Roles in Implementation of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Hoa Binh Province, Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Le Nguyen Phuong

    (Vietnam National University of Agriculture)

  • Quyen Mai

    (Vietnam National University of Forest)

Abstract

The policy of payment for forest environmental services (PFES) has been implemented in Vietnam since 2011 and in Hoa Binh province since 2013. Governmental agencies have conventionally implemented PFES at central, provincial, and district levels. However, there are shared responsibilities of the governmental organizations and other stakeholders at different levels in reality. Using social network analysis (SNA) indicators shows that the provincial Forest Forest Protection and Development Fund plays the most important role among involving stakeholders. Both density and centrality measurements have shown that the stakeholders in the PFES implementation network in Hoa Binh province have good coherence. Additionally, district-level governmental organizations and Viettel Telecom Company have shown their powerlessness in the policy implementation network.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Nguyen Phuong & Quyen Mai, 2021. "Identifying Stakeholders’ Roles in Implementation of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Hoa Binh Province, Vietnam," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 22(2), pages 113-127, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:22:y:2021:i:2:p:113-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://reaser.eu/RePec/rse/wpaper/REASER22_09_Le_P113-127.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Implementation; Policy of payment for forest environmental services (PFES); Social network analysis; Stakeholder;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q00 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - General
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q19 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:22:y:2021:i:2:p:113-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Epure (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pgsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.