IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rpo/ripoec/v94y2004i4p19-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advice from a Friendly American on the Proposed Constitution for the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • William A. Niskanen

    (Cato Institute, Washington (DC))

Abstract

This paper summarizes the major strengths and weaknesses of the US Constitution and the proposed EU Constitution. The most important difference between the US and proposed EU Constitutions involves the concept of rights. The US Bill of Rights is a list of individual rights against the State. In contrast, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which constitutes Part II of the proposed EU Constitution, is a list of claims to services provided by the State. The combination of free movement within the EU and this list of claims on the State represents the most important potential tension in the European Union.

Suggested Citation

  • William A. Niskanen, 2004. "Advice from a Friendly American on the Proposed Constitution for the European Union," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 94(4), pages 19-28, July-Augu.
  • Handle: RePEc:rpo:ripoec:v:94:y:2004:i:4:p:19-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rivistapoliticaeconomica.it/2004/lu-ago/niskanen.php
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rpo:ripoec:v:94:y:2004:i:4:p:19-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabrina Marino (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.