IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rmcimn/v20y2019i1p63-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of the Characteristics of Public Procurement Systems in Germany, France and Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Ionel PREDA

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

In public procurement, an important role is played by the analysis of the way public procurement takes place in other European Union (EU) countries. Although public procurement in EU Member States are governed by the same general rules established by a series of Directives that Member States have to transpose into national law, there are a number of significant differences and characteristics between public procurement systems. These differences are very important as they can lead to the identification and adoption of measures that can generate a number of effects, such as: increasing the efficiency of the use of budget funds, reducing the time of a procurement procedure, reducing the number of complaints, increasing the number of tenderers that participate in procurement procedures, encouraging the participation in procedures of small and medium enterprises, etc. The article describes an analysis of the main features of public procurement in the two most important EU member states, namely Germany and France, which are analysed in comparison with the public procurement system in Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionel PREDA, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of the Characteristics of Public Procurement Systems in Germany, France and Romania," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(1), pages 63-77, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:63-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rmci.ase.ro/no20vol1/05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public procurement; procurement procedure; principles of public procurement; value threshold; award criterion; assessment factor.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C46 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Specific Distributions
    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:63-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marian Nastase (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.