IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rmcimn/v10y2009i5p877-892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Analysis of the Romanian Energy Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Dumitru MIRON

    (Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Mihaela PREDA

    (Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

One of the basic components of the management of a programme of reform is the Stakeholder Analysis. It allows understanding and assessing the programme environment and provides to the management information defining the negociation position in the programme implementation. The paper undertakes a stakeholder analysis of the Romanian energy sector in relation with the programme of the reform of the energy policy of Romania, as a member state of the European Union. Using a matrix diagram, stakeholders are classified in different categories. This matrix diagram is the result of evaluation of the interest and of the power of these stakeholders over the Programme. In conclusion, both key stakeholders who have power and are most interested to develope the Programme and those who are not favourable in Programme development but have power and can adversely influence the Programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumitru MIRON & Mihaela PREDA, 2009. "Stakeholder Analysis of the Romanian Energy Sector," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(5), pages 877-892, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:10:y:2009:i:5:p:877-892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rmci.ase.ro/no10vol5/Vol10_No5_Article3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Bracking, 2009. "Hiding Conflict over Industry Returns: A Stakeholder Analysis of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 9109, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pudjianto, D. & Castro, M. & Strbac, G. & Liu, Z. & van der Sluis, L. & Papaefthymiou, G., 2016. "Asymmetric impacts of European transmission network development towards 2050: Stakeholder assessment based on IRENE-40 scenarios," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 261-269.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roy Maconachie & Radhika Srinivasan & Nicholas Menzies, 2015. "Responding to the Challenge of Fragility and Security in West Africa," World Bank Publications - Reports 22511, The World Bank Group.
    2. Anthony Bebbington & Elisa Arond & Juan Luis Dammert, 2016. "Scalar politics and transnational governance innovations: A political settlements lens on the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in the Andes," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-066-16, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    3. Bürgi Bonanomi, Elisabeth & Elsig, Manfred & Espa, Ilaria, 2015. "The Commodity Sector and Related Governance Challenges from a Sustainable Development Perspective: The Example of Switzerland Current Research Gaps," Papers 865, World Trade Institute.
    4. Cyril Obi, 2010. "Oil as the ‘curse’ of conflict in Africa: peering through the smoke and mirrors," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(126), pages 483-495, December.
    5. Nelson Oppong, 2018. "Negotiating transparency: NGOs and contentious politics of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Ghana," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 58-71, January.
    6. Kinda, Harouna & Thiombiano, Noël, 2024. "Does transparency matter? Evaluating the Impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) on Deforestation in Resource-rich Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Liliane C. Mouan, 2010. "Exploring the potential benefits of Asian participation in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative: The case of China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(6), pages 367-376, September.
    8. Schuler Douglas A., 2012. "A club theory approach to voluntary social programs: Multinational companies and the extractive industries transparency initiative," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    stakeholders; power; finance; programme of reform; investments.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:10:y:2009:i:5:p:877-892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marian Nastase (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.