IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/merase/v10y2025i1p80-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Proximity on Trust Restoration from an Organisational Apology

Author

Listed:
  • Eric RHODES

    (California State University, USA)

  • Samuel CLARKE

    (Utah Tech University, USA)

  • Masahisa Kurt YAMAGUCHI

    (Chaminade University, USA,)

Abstract

Modern organisations frequently issue public apologies in the aftermath of a perceived transgression as a strategy to restore lost trust. Our paper examines the impact of social proximity on the efficacy of organisational apologies issued to consumers based on questionnaire data from two studies of 193 and 342 participants. It was discovered that the inclusion of language indicating geographic and leadership proximity in an apology led to the restoration of significantly more trust compared to apologies that did not include any references to proximity. By contrast, apologies that included references to relationship and network proximity were significantly less restorative of trust compared to apologies that did not include any proximity references. Our research is the first study to examine the intersection of social proximity and organisational apologies. Based on our findings, we contend that organisations should include references to geographic and leadership proximity in their apologies and exclude references to relationship and network proximity.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric RHODES & Samuel CLARKE & Masahisa Kurt YAMAGUCHI, 2025. "The Impact of Proximity on Trust Restoration from an Organisational Apology," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(1), pages 80-88, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:merase:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:80-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mer.ase.ro/files/2025-1/10-1-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    apology; communication; leadership; proximity; trust.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:merase:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:80-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.