IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v9y2015i1p1017-1025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Dynamic Analysis Of The Main Strengths And Weaknesses Of Romanian Firms' Management

Author

Listed:
  • Ion POPA
  • Simona Catalina STEFAN
  • Doina I. POPESCU

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to highlight the main strengths and weaknesses of the Romanian firms' management and their dynamics in the period 2009 – 2014. The research is based on empirical data resulted from questionnaire based surveys developed in the years 2009 - 2014 by Nicolescu, Verboncu & Profiroiu (2010, 2011), Nicolescu et al. (2012), Nicolescu, Popa & Nicolescu (2013, 2014, 2015) and addressed to representative samples of respondents comprised of teachers, researchers and consultants (on one hand) and managers and specialists of companies (the other side). At the end of the paper, there are conclusions that will allow us to identify a number of short, medium and long-term priorities to which Romanian firms should respond and find the most efficient means of managerial action to address these priorities and improve their performances and effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Ion POPA & Simona Catalina STEFAN & Doina I. POPESCU, 2015. "The Dynamic Analysis Of The Main Strengths And Weaknesses Of Romanian Firms' Management," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 1017-1025, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:1017-1025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2015/pdf/108.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna SADKOWSKA, 2016. "The Difficulty in Following Project Schedule as a Key Project Management Challenge: Family Firm Perspective," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(2), pages 136-147, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:1017-1025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.